Stand-up: On which topic are you currently working?
Discussion: what are your expectations of a satisfying concall?
Removing the GMF editors and keep only Sirius editor from the new PCM (Snigdha)
Attendees
Martina
Anne
Floriment
Larissa
Manar
Maximilian
Nicolas
Snigdha
Steffen
Stephan
Yves
Stand Up
Martina: in progress: trigger code generation in experiment automation and upper bound for amount of users
Stephan: monitors build mailing list and manages transfers of build role to Larissa and Nicolas
Floriment: Mosaic project, new features based on project, nested resource containers, SSP presentation of event-based Slingshot simulator
Maximilian: ticket about adding constraints to metamodel finished, new ticket for triggering constraint validation in analyses
Yves: reviews for API to create PCM models based on code
Snigdha: working on ticket for selecting required role if ambiguous. new points to be discussed later in the meeting.
Larissa: migration of build to new Eclipse version and working on test cases for new project wizard.
Nicolas: migration of projects to new Eclipse version
Manar: finished ticket on operations tab in properties view, merge and review of JaMoPP contributions of student, work on SoMoX
Anne/Steffen: Secured funding to keep work running
Status Dev Board
How to do review for results, which are not code on Github?
Set status to "closed" and ask someone to review the issue
After the review has been done, set status to "fixed" if result is satisfying
Move back to "in progress" if result needs some improvements
Not too much progress in sprint, therefore the current sprint will be just prolonged
Expectations of Satisfying Concall
Steffen
positive: Get to know about recent changes and work -> works quite well on a high level already.
negative: Integration of Karlsruhe and Stuttgart could be improved
Maximilian
focus on discussion about tickets is good
exchange of implementation details / background knowledge for working on tickets is limited because knowledge is already missing in the team
Yves
getting help works usually quite well
avoid in-depth discussions on topics only relevant for one person because knowledge to contribute to discussion is not available (maybe prepare or at least introduce such discussion in a way that all people can understand the context, maybe support by visual drawing on whiteboard, maybe timebox such discussions and move to bi-lateral discussions -> audience should indicate that the current discussion gets out of hand e.g. via chat)
Snigdha
should we contact the reportee or discuss trouble with tickets in the concall -> first reportee, then concall if reportee cannot help
posting questions in Palladio Slack could also be a good way to get feedback
distinguish between the introduction of an issue and solving the issue
Floriment
overall satisfying, good overview
integration of Stuttgart/Karlsruhe should be improved process-wise
Manar
requesting support / asking questions works pretty well
supporting teaching groups and pointing to them is beneficial
Martina
some discussions are too long/in-depth
attendance could be improved
Action items for next time:
Do stand-up in the following concalls again
Moderate/introduce discussions in a way to keep everyone on track
Remove GMF Editors
remove them from aggregated update site
keep dedicated update site of GMF editors as long as possible
